The Greatest Guide To h4831sc

The Greatest Guide To h4831sc

Blog Article

Since there doesn't appear to be any "official" Load Data out there for this Load, can several of you offer a place to begin with this mixture and matters to consider when working this Load up?

I've used H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There aren't several cartridges that I use it for as I appear often to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I am unable to say that it isn't going to do the job. It is simply that Several other powders operate better for just a supplied cartridge. By way of example, while in the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really fantastic groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally much better in accuracy, though the velocity was pretty much similar.

The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be viewing larger velocities acquired with that powder, in contrast to Everything you've seen Together with the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but to some degree superior suited to a bit smaller sized situations having a bit less ability.

Caution making use of SC or SSC produced loads with extended Reduce, back off and work up. Use Protected loading strategies.

some cartridges are likely copper foul much more than Many others nevertheless, despite how sleek the finish is around the bore and require cleansing of your copper fouling extra generally.

Did you ever try H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Pondering What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

I'm utilizing it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as correct. RL22 did perfectly but I was somewhat worried about temp stability. I feel I am at seventy two grains and acquire around 2850ish fps

and you might like to invest in some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust over the years. 4831 powder of decades in the past isn't exact as precisely what is currently available. that may be why someone serious about reloading safely and securely may have one of the most present load data textbooks to make reference to.

I have uncovered the precise reverse to generally be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was h4831 vs h4831sc the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly precise powder in my three hundred Acquire Mag.

What's more, it goes on to declare that as a result of fshorter grains, that load density could be slightly bigger.

This really is an more mature thread, you may not receive a reaction, and could be reviving an outdated thread. Please take into account creating a new thread.

Like Absolutely everyone mentioned, the SC means “short Slash” and is also a bit easier to meter. Tends to make you dilemma why they would even now make the normal a single.

rayporter reported: i hardly ever noticed a h4831 vs h4831sc difference apart from the typical is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to expand...

I could stack em in a single hole but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. Right after months, I got Fortunate and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention h4831 vs h4831sc paid a little bit further. The extremely future week in a gun display a man had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I neglect exactly how much, but With all the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.